Latest news with #pension pots
Daily Mail
15 hours ago
- Business
- Daily Mail
Tax hit on inherited pensions confirmed for 2027 - and families will be landed with the red tape
Bereaved families rather than pension firms will be responsible for working out and paying inheritance tax on retirement pots from 2027, the Government has announced. It confirmed plans to go ahead with a 'double tax hit' on inherited pensions, but has spared pension scheme administrators from making deductions and payments direct to the taxman. Initially it planned to require pension schemes to deal with this red tape before paying the balance of the pension to an estate, but its change of heart means executors and administrators will have to do this work. In another key change, it has exempted all 'death in service' benefits from the inheritance tax changes following an outcry - including from unions representing workers such as firefighters. The Government announced in last year's Budget that money remaining in pension pots is going to become liable for inheritance tax like other assets, such as property, savings and investments, in two years' time. But critics say some wealthy families could be taxed twice. If a saver is aged over 75 when they die, their beneficiaries are still going to have to pay their normal income tax rate of 20 per cent, 40 per cent or 45 per cent on pension withdrawals too. For a 45 per cent taxpayer this represents a 67 per cent tax rate, and the tapering of the residence nil rate band down to nothing on estates worth £2million-plus would mean an effective tax rate of 70.5 per cent. Retirement pots can be passed on free of income tax when someone dies before age 75. > How much is inheritance tax and who pays? Find out below How will inheritance tax be levied on pensions? The Government originally intended pension scheme administrators rather than 'personal representatives' - executors and administrators - to be liable for the reporting and payment of any inheritance tax on pensions. But it heard protests that this would bring inherited pensions in estates with no IHT liability into the process unnecessarily, and lead to delays in paying out funds to beneficiaries. Also, schemes would probably make payments on account of the maximum possible amount of inheritance tax - 40 per cent of the value of any unused funds - to avoid late payment interest charges after the six months deadline. Families would then have to sort this out afterwards. The Government therefore decided to make personal representatives, who are already responsible for administering the rest of the estate, liable for reporting and paying any inheritance tax due on pensions and death benefits. Meanwhile, it will take separate steps to deal with the 'small number' of estates that will not have sufficient liquid funds to pay the inheritance tax due on the pensions. Regarding its decision to keep death in service benefits out of IHT after all, the Government admitted to 'inconsistencies' in the initial plans, which 'would not be consistent with the broader rationale of ending the use of pensions as a tax planning vehicle'. What will this mean for bereaved families? 'Life is tough enough when you have just lost a loved one without having extra layers of bureaucracy on top,' says former Pensions Minister Steve Webb, who is now a partner at pension consultant LCP. 'In future, the person dealing with the estate will need to track down all of the pensions held by the deceased which may have any balances in them, contact the schemes, collate all the information and put it into an online calculator and then work out and pay the inheritance tax bill.' Webb points out all of this will have to be done before a probate application can be made - meaning executors and administrators will not yet have access to the funds in an estate - potentially slowing down the winding up process substantially. 'Complications will no doubt arise where the family member cannot track down all of the deceased person's pensions or where providers are slow to supply the information needed to work out the inheritance tax bill.' Webb, who is This is Money's pensions columnist, adds: 'His Majesty's Revenue and Customs will have to give serious thought to the penalty rules around late payment of IHT to ensure that grieving families are not at risk of fines in cases where delays in resolving matters relating to pensions are not under their control. 'Whilst the changes HMRC has made are undoubtedly good news for pension schemes and those who administer them, it is hard to see that they are good news for bereaved families,' says Webb. How long do you have to pay inheritance tax? You get just six months, kicking off from the last day of the month after a loved one's death, to add up their assets, calculate what is owed and hand over any money due to the taxman. If you are late, you will be charged interest on the unpaid tax - it is currently 8.25 per cent a year. If no money is due, you get 12 months leeway to simply fill in the forms to show nothing is owed. But you will need to settle this issue one way or another with HMRC, if you need to get probate to gain control of the deceased person's funds - it won't be granted without the taxman's official sign-off. > Read a 12-step guide to working out and paying inheritance tax Bringing unused pensions into the ambit of inheritance tax is a 'seismic shift' in how we think about and plan for retirement and estate planning, according to Quilter pensions specialist Roddy Munro. 'Without further amendments, how the policy is eventually enacted risks turning a targeted tax reform into an administrative minefield,' he says. 'What we could end up seeing is a massive transfer of private wealth back to the state. 'What's more, while only a small fraction of estates will pay more tax, a far greater number will face needless complexity, delays, and stress – often at the worst possible time.' Craig Rickman, pensions expert at Interactive Investor, welcomes confirmation that inheritance tax won't be levied on death in service benefits. But he adds: 'The proposals entering draft legislation remain fraught with issues, risking lengthy probate delays and additional costs, which may cause unnecessary distress to grieving family members. 'Consumers are already altering their behaviour ahead of April 2027, in some cases making pension withdrawals sooner than previously intended in fear of loved ones being hit with exorbitant tax bills and facing an administrative maelstrom. 'This could not only lead to poorer outcomes in retirement, but damage trust and confidence in a pension system that is already on shaky ground. 'Furthermore, savers might be extracting and passing on money from their pensions that they need to meet future financial responsibilities, such as to cover the cost of care.' Pete Maddern, managing director for retirement at Canada Life, says there would have been unintended consequences with making pension scheme administrators responsible for paying inheritance tax on pension funds and death benefits. 'Aligning with the existing process will help ensure that beneficiaries receive what they are owed without delay and mean that unnecessary burdens aren't placed on personal representatives and families at an already difficult time.' Regarding death-in-service payments, he says: 'These benefits provide a critical short-term financial lifeline for loved ones following the death of a working-age earner. 'Including them in the scope of the changes risked much wider repercussions not only for grieving families, but also for the employers that provide these benefits for their workforce.' How much is inheritance tax and who pays? Inheritance tax is levied at 40 per cent on estates above a certain size. You need to be worth £325,000 if you are single, or £650,000 jointly if you are married or in a civil partnership, for your loved ones to have to stump up inheritance tax. A further allowance, the residence nil rate band, increases the threshold by £175,000 each - so £350,000 for a married couple - for those who leave their home to direct descendants. This creates a potential maximum joint inheritance tax-free total of £1million. This own home allowance starts being removed once an estate reaches £2million, at a rate of £1 for every £2 above the threshold. It vanishes completely by £2.3million. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said in the Budget these thresholds will be frozen until 2030.
Telegraph
10-07-2025
- Health
- Telegraph
Streeting opens way for doctors to top up pay with pensions
Wes Streeting has opened the door to cutting junior doctors' pension pots in order to raise their pay. The Health Secretary said he would discuss the policy to avert a new round of strikes that threaten to derail his landmark 10-year plan to fix the NHS. The medics, now known as resident doctors, will walk out for five days later this month in an attempt to secure a 29 per cent pay rise – months after receiving a 22 per cent boost. Downing Street on Tuesday said negotiations over pay were off the table, but Mr Streeting has suggested there could be a 'discussion' about forfeiting future state pensions in exchange for pay now. Doctors are among the public sector workers eligible for lucrative, gold-plated pensions, costing the Treasury billions of pounds each month. The Cabinet Office is understood to be considering proposals to increase pay in exchange for the Government making lower pension contributions, following an increase in workers opting out of employer pension schemes. Mr Streeting said: 'We've got this situation where the pension pot is so big that consultants lobby us to change the tax rules. 'They're taxed so heavily on the pensions because they're that valuable that they say, 'I might as well not bother working, my pension's so valuable'.' Speaking to LBC, he added: 'If the BMA want to come to me and say, 'Do you know what? Given that challenge, we would rather have a slightly less generous pension in order to have higher pay today', those are the sorts of issues you can get into in a discussion.' NHS pensions include a threshold which restricts the amount of tax-free pension growth allowed each year. It means doctors could be penalised for taking on extra work such as through initiatives to clear the backlog if they breach that amount, triggering a high rate increase in taxation that the BMA says would mean 'they are paying to work'. While the impact on pay depends on the year compared to and the inflation measure used – the BMA uses the retail price index (RPI) instead of the industry-standard consumer price index (CPI) – there is less debate about the size of doctors' pensions. They are often worth about 75 per cent of doctors' salaries in retirement and guaranteed to rise with inflation each year. Doctors enjoy index-linked, taxpayer-funded, 'defined benefit' schemes, many of which pay a proportion of the recipient's final salary from the day they retire. Under the NHS scheme, staff contribute between 5.2 per cent and 12.5 per cent of their salaries, while the state contributes 23.7 per cent each year, far outpacing most private sector arrangements. As a result, the NHS is paying out nearly £1 billion a month in staff pensions, with almost 2,000 staff receiving pensions of over £100,000 annually – a figure that has more than doubled in a year – although this includes all staff, not just doctors. Someone who started as a junior doctor eight years ago on a starting salary of about £27,000 will have already built up an annual pension of more than £8,000. A first-year resident doctor today will earn a starting salary of around £39,000 as a result of recent pay rises. The median pension claimed by GPs was £53,300 a year in 2023-24 and £40,090 for hospital doctors, according to a report by the government's pay review body on doctors and dentists. The BMA's junior doctors' committee are demanding a 29.2 per cent increase to their base pay, despite having received 5.4 per cent on average this year – more than any other public sector worker for the second year in a row. The union claims this is necessary because of real-terms cuts to doctors' pay dating back to 2008. The walkout later this month could mean more than 200,000 appointments are cancelled, based on data from previous strikes. The strike could endanger the success of Mr Streeting's 10-year plan to save the health service, which he announced last week with promises to 'bring down devastating hospital waiting lists'. Figures published on Thursday revealed the NHS waiting list had fallen to 7.36 million, just 260,000 fewer than when Labour came into power. Mr Streeting urged the BMA to abandon its walkout, saying that doctors' strikes 'ruin lives' and could lead to job cuts. He said public support for the BMA has 'collapsed' and that strikes would jeopardise the NHS's 'fragile' recovery. Ed Argar, the shadow health secretary, said Labour was paying the price for 'caving into union demands for above inflation pay rises without any conditions or strings attached'. He said: 'Labour's weakness is sadly fuelling this crisis. If they don't get a grip now, a summer of discontent and strikes risks turning into a summer of chaos, and it will be patients that pay the price.'
